Beyond the Box Score: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Coyotes Ink Aucoin to One Year Deal


spread the word

Top Fifty Players Of 2008

As a conclusion to the series on the most productive players at each position, I'm going to run down the Top Fifty among all positions.  Speaking of those positional articles:

1B | 2B | SS | 3B | DH | LF | CF | RF | CA

As a reminder, I'm using Justin's Stats, which, in my opinion, are the best publicly available total value player ratings.  Better than VORP.  Better than Win Shares.  Significantly better than WARP.  The highlights include:

  • BaseRuns-derived offensive linear weights, with park adjustments.
  • League-adjusted replacement-level, since AL pitching is stronger than NL pitching.
  • Proper position adjustments using the CA - SS - 2B/3B/CF - LF/RF - 1B - DH spectrum.
  • Combined STATS and BIS zone ratings converted to runs to measure fielding.

There are some people who have reservations about the fielding ratings.  I agree that the current state of fielding metrics is less than ideal, but let's not pretend that they're even close to worthless.  However, if you prefer to use your own fielding ratings (personal judgment, Pinto's PMR, Dewan's +/-, or whatever), Justin's stats are still valuable to you.  Focus on the offensive values and the positional adjustments, which combine to form a VORP-like number, only better.  Why better?  Because they include league-adjustments, don't undervalue walks, and make position adjustments based on the defensive spectrum instead of offensive averages.  Then you can add in your fielding rating of choice.

Rather than just post a table of the Top Fifty (well, Top Fifty-Two), I've divided the list into tiers and added some commentary.

The Almost All-Stars

These guys had very good seasons, but probably wouldn't make their league's post-season All-Star team without positional scarcity needs.  How many of your friends would be surprised that Christian Guzman and BJ Upton were as valuable as Ichiro Suzuki and Carlos Quentin.

Rank Player Off Pos Field Total
52 Alex I Rios 31 -3 7 35
51 Marco Scutaro 11 3 21 35
50 Mike A Aviles 25 4 6 35
49 Milton Bradley 50 -11 -4 36
48 Cristian Guzman 27 6 3 36
47 Torii Hunter 33 2 1 36
46 Andre E Ethier 45 -6 -3 36
45 B.J. Upton 36 2 -2 37
44 Carlos J Quentin 52 -6 -9 37
43 Carlos Pena 44 -10 4 37
42 Joey D Votto 38 -11 10 37
41 Ichiro Suzuki 39 -3 2 38
40 Troy Glaus 39 2 -3 38
39 Randy Winn 33 -6 11 38

Star-divide

Two Big Bats and Eight Good Gloves

Seeing Geovany Soto and Aubrey Huff listed right next to each other is a great example of why defense matters.  And seeing Jayson Werth and Shane Victorino three spots away from each other is a great  reminder of why the Phillies won the World Series.

Rank Player Off Pos Field Total
38 J.J. Hardy 26 7 6 39
37 Shane Victorino 30 2 8 40
36 Ian M Kinsler 45 2 -6 40
35 Russell N Martin 30 11 0 41
34 Jayson Werth 32 -3 12 41
33 Placido Polanco 27 2 12 41
32 Aramis Ramirez 43 2 -4 41
31 Johnny Damon 46 -3 -1 42
30 Aubrey Huff 56 -14 1 42
29 Geovany Soto 31 10 2 43

The Cornerstones

With thirty MLB teams, you can think of the top thirty position players as the guys GMs would pick first in the ultimate sandlot game.  Notice that we've reached the point where nearly everyone is above average on both offense and defense.

Rank Player Off Pos Field Total
28 Dan C Uggla 41 2 2 45
27 Ryan J Braun 43 -7 9 45
26 Evan Longoria 36 2 8 46
25 Nick Markakis 59 -7 -4 48
24 Jimmy Rollins 30 6 11 48
23 Kevin E Youkilis 54 -8 4 50
22 Brian M McCann 42 10 -1 50
21 Ryan Ludwick 57 -6 -1 51
20 Josh H Hamilton 51 0 0 51
19 Curtis Granderson 47 2 3 51
18 Jose Reyes 51 7 -7 52
17 Adrian Beltre 28 2 24 53
16 Matt T Holliday 52 -6 8 54

The Down-Ballot MVP Picks

If there was an MVP handed out to all of Major League Baseball, these are the guys who would garner some votes from the BBWAA wackos, but wouldn't actually deserve them.  Of course, they deserve pretty much all other praise we can heap upon them.

Rank Player Off Pos Field Total
15 Brian Giles 49 -7 13 56
14 Manny Ramirez 73 -5 -14 56
13 Brian Roberts 50 2 6 59
12 Joe Mauer 44 10 7 61
11 Dustin L Pedroia 50 2 9 61

The Modern Baseball Idols

Nobody in this year's top ten was a one-year wonder -- all have multiple All-Star caliber seasons under their belts.  These are the players we will eventually debate for entry into the Hall of Fame and the players we will tell our children about.   Notice everyone to rate this high had positive defensive value, and most were ten runs above average.  On the offensive side, the least productive hitters were still five wins better than replacement with the bat.

Rank Player Off Pos Field Total
10 Carlos Beltran 53 2 11 66
9 David A Wright 62 3 2 67
8 Alex Rodriguez 60 2 7 69
7 Lance Berkman 68 -11 17 74
6 Mark Teixeira 65 -12 21 74
5 Grady Sizemore 64 2 9 76
4 Chase Utley 53 2 21 76
3 Hanley Ramirez 69 7 3 79
2 Chipper Jones 66 2 14 81

The Tier Before The Albert Pujols Tier

The Albert Pujols Tier

Scroll back up to The Cornerstones Tier.  Pick two of those players.  Together, they were as valuable as one Albert Pujols.  To think that he might not win the BBWAA's MVP award and that he didn't win the Hank Aaron award is a travesty.  Would Lou Gehrig have received this treatment if he were playing today?  A 10 WAR season is worth about $45MM on the current free agent pay scale, by the way.

Rank Player Off Pos Field Total
1 Albert Pujols 89 -11 20 98

0 recs | Comment 42 comments | Share on Facebook Digg!

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Am I reading this correctly?

Ryan Braun is rated better defensively(at his particular position) then Longoria? I understand they play different positions, which are rated differently…but when I see Braun with a +9 and Longoria with a +8, then if I’m reading this correctly, it really causes me to question these defensive numbers.

by td32 on Nov 11, 2008 9:54 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So Braun is better at his position then Longo is?

But because of the position difference, Longo is more valuable? I underdstand the concept that 3rd is a more heavily weighted position then LF, but I dont understand how Braun could be rated higher in the “field” metric.

by td32 on Nov 11, 2008 1:28 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Isnt that what the position metric is for?

To even out the position difference? Am I wrong that the field metric is for how well they play the position? If so, then it has Braun as a better player at his position then Longoria is at his position…which I find hard to believe.

by td32 on Nov 11, 2008 1:26 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yes. production = rate x playing time

I think we’re all a bit surprised at how well Braun rated in left field, even though we knew he’d be a much better fit out there than at third base. Some comments:

  • A difference of +9 to +8 is hardly significant, even if the fielding metrics were perfect. Our surprised should really be that Braun was in the same ballpark as Longoria, relative to position.
  • The whole relative to position thing shouldn’t be ignored. Left field is MUCH easier to play than third base. I mean, think about who’s out there, and how good they are. Over a full season, it’s ten runs less valuable/easier to play than third base.
  • The fielding metrics certainly have a largeish margin of error. Small bumps to both players make it seem like a landslide for Longoria. For example, adding just three runs and subtracting just three runs puts it at a +11 to +6 advantage for Longoria relative to position, or a 15 run advantage on overall defense.

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Nov 11, 2008 2:33 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

"Over a full season, it’s ten runs less valuable/easier to play than third base."

Is this just an arbitrary statement, or has it actually been determined somehow that this is true?

the enemy's gate is down.

by SleepyCA on Nov 11, 2008 7:04 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Click the "spectrum" link in the bullet points above.

And it might help to click the two links in that post.

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Nov 11, 2008 7:24 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

got it

seems like a LOT of assumptions are being made, and then ignored, but maybe I’m just being overly skeptical.

the enemy's gate is down.

by SleepyCA on Nov 11, 2008 8:54 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Report back after you read through things.

As evidence by all the tidy 5 run gaps between positions, the precision here isn’t amazing. But, well, share what you think. Tango and MGL aren’t guys that tend to make assumptions and not test them.

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Nov 11, 2008 9:02 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm familiar with tango and MGL's work

they are both brilliant people who write very good things; I’ve had “the book” on my shelf for a long time and have read it cover to cover more than once. I’m just not sure it is possible to agree or disagree with their position on this one because not enough work is being shown; you as a reader have to assume that a lot of what they say is correct, and I’m from missouri.

Anyway, for now lets assume that their assumptions are correct. Using these numbers, would it be true to say that not only could albert pujols or Mark Teixeira theoretically play SS, but they’d be about (+20 -11 -7 = +2) runs above average defensively there? Do I have my polarity correct on the SS positional adjustment? Am I missing something?

the enemy's gate is down.

by SleepyCA on Nov 11, 2008 10:50 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I believe this is the correct interpretation:

Pujols and Tex are as valuable as shortstops who are +2 run fielders. If their skillsets (range, arm, speed, health, diving ability, hands, etc) are in proportion to that of the average major leaguer, they would be expected to be +2 fielders at shortstop given adequate training time.

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Nov 11, 2008 11:01 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Pujols needs to start demanding team ownership of any team he signs with.

Clutch: A measurement of how much better or worse a player does in high leverage situations than he would have done in a context neutral environment. http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/glossary/

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Nov 11, 2008 11:42 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Seriously

I see him play all the time, and he still astounds.

by spants on Nov 11, 2008 9:32 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yes

It’s not that weird, Dewan’s +/- has Braun at +9 and Longoria at +11 for their positions. Obviously no fielding system is entirely reliable but the data used here is pretty accurate, and pretty close to Dewan.

by gingerbreadmann on Nov 11, 2008 11:42 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If Braun really has made these kinds of strides defensively

albeit with a position change, and if he ever learns to take more walks, then yikes.
Oh, and Albert Pujols clearly benefits from the energy he absorbs from Earth’s yellow sun. He once gave tips to Chuck Norris about fixing his roundhouse kick timing problems. He’s simply unfair, and luckily he’s unfair for the benefit of my team. If he misses the MVP this year I will never shut up about it.

by mattybobo on Nov 11, 2008 12:05 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

+1

on the not shutting up about an MVP upset for The Mang.

by spants on Nov 11, 2008 9:33 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

LOL at the Mets

3 of the 18 best with 2 in the top 10, and still no playoffs.

Where’s Delgado on this list?

by rglass44 on Nov 11, 2008 12:31 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's not very funny

Who's world is it? It's yours.

by BlackOps on Nov 11, 2008 2:14 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You're right

It’s freaking hilarious.

Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found
a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up
that much.

~George Costanza~

by Sandy Kazmir on Nov 11, 2008 3:55 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Possibly

On some days I feel that way.

Who's world is it? It's yours.

by BlackOps on Nov 12, 2008 12:49 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Defensive adjustment

Now, I’ve always felt that it was actually better to use the replacement offensive value at each position than a defensive adjustment. The argument in its favor would be that a certain degree of defensive demands makes it that much harder to find a given offensive performance that can handle those demands, which is what the metric measures. But if there happens to be very little offensive talent at any given position at any given time, that would make offense at that position that much more valuable. Justin’s metric might be better for historical comparison, but not for present value, unless I’m missing something.

I will not allow the denigration of the life essence

by GenJackRipper on Nov 11, 2008 12:50 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Defensive adjustments are better, although I was where you are a year ago.

If all teams suddenly move their good players away from first base to right field, does that make a guy who stays at 1B way more valuable or a guy who was in RF way less valuable? Nope. What determines the value of a position is who can handle it defensively. For 1B, 98% of the population qualifies. For SS, maybe only 20% can handle it without being complete butchers. If teams aren’t efficiently dividing their talent between positions appropriately, that shouldn’t reflect on how valuable a certain player is.

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Nov 11, 2008 2:37 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Lemme see if I can explain it.

In 1961, center fielders as a group hit .273/.351/.434, compared to .271/.341/.440 for left fielders. Do we think that left fielders are more valuable than center fielders for that year, given the same defensive contribution relative to position? Not at all.

The average defensive left fielder is less valuable than the average defensive center fielder, given the same offensive production, because we know – know! – that the average defensive CFer can go out there and be an above-average defensive left fielder. That doesn’t change simply because this year Willie Mays, Mickey Mantle and Hank Aaron are all playing center field and are around the offensive peaks.

Or look at it this way. If I’m the manager of the Yankees in 1961, and I’m trying to figure out my outfield going into spring training, I’ve got:

  • Roger Maris
  • Mickey Mantle
  • Yogi Berra

I know that of them, Mantle is my best defensive outfielder. I put Mantle in center field, because that’s where his defense is the most valuable. This is true regardless of what players other teams are fielding, and how well they perform.

But we measure defense relative to average at that position. And by that analysis, we could conclude that Berra and Mantle had equal defensive value – after all, LF and CF hit about the same, right? Maybe Yogi’s defense was actually MORE valuable than Mantle’s – just eyeball the DTs. Berra had a higher Rate2 than Mantle.

But we know that’s not true – Mantle’s defense was better, and that’s why he was playing CF to begin with.

by cwyers on Nov 11, 2008 6:10 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

(And yes, I’m sure I missed some of the finer subtleties of the Yankees outfield situation in 1961 – that’s what I get for eyeballing some B-Ref pages and the DT cards and going from there. The idea is to “put a face” on what could be some rather abstract math, not to get tied to the particulars of Yoggi Berra versus Mickey Mantle.)

by cwyers on Nov 11, 2008 6:18 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Interesting

But there is no continuum of defensive skill. A great SS might make a lousy C. A great C might make a lousy CF. Even 1B requires different skill sets than other positions. With CF and LF, there is a much more of a continuum, so it works better. But in general, it’s easy to imagine a drought of a specific skill, like catching or OF.

I can handle the Math if your disposed to let me in on it.

I will not allow the denigration of the life essence

by GenJackRipper on Nov 11, 2008 7:29 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

For the math, click on the "spectrum" link in the post. Then click through to the two articles linked to there.

Yes, the LF/CF transition is much smoother than most. But there are still plenty of players who move between other positions. The adjustments aren’t saying every player can transition between two positions as per the adjustments. But since those are the AVERAGE transitions, they show how much more valuable one position is than another. You definitely want to optimized a player’s skill set.

Catchers are a different beast. And there’s next to zero support for their position on the spectrum other than logic and offensive numbers.

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Nov 11, 2008 8:40 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Nice work Sky

Now get cracking on the pitchers so we can all argue some more.

Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found
a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up
that much.

~George Costanza~

by Sandy Kazmir on Nov 11, 2008 3:55 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I have a philosophical dilemna with the pitchers.

As in, what should I hold them accountable for? IP is a given (maybe adjusted IP if using some sort of defense-independent stat). But ERA? FIP? xFIP? tRA? tRA*? WPA? I actually think the ideal metric would be some sort of PMR for pitchers, where they get judged on the probabilities of their batted balls, before knowing whether they’re turned into outs or not. With park adjustments, naturally.

By the way, Justin’s deserves most of the hitters’ credit for creating the spreadsheet.

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Nov 11, 2008 5:37 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I feel ya

I am unsure which pitching metric to use. I like FIPRAR but it completely over values players like Javier Vazquez.

by FlimtotheFlam on Nov 11, 2008 6:50 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Maybe a good stat in the interim

would be to use either tRA/FIP and ERA in some sort of averages combination, regressing to one or the other… Maybe the more data we have on a pitcher, the bigger proportion ERA (park adjusted?) takes on relative to tRA?

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by devil_fingers on Nov 11, 2008 11:10 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I actually think the ideal metric would be some sort of PMR for pitchers, where they get judged on the probabilities of their batted balls, before knowing whether they’re turned into outs or not.

That sound identical to tRA*.

..so allow me to present Tim Lincecum and Matt Cain as two sweet, sweet bottles of warming hooch.

by Cookyman on Nov 13, 2008 11:59 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

tRA doesn't use any information outside of the eight batted ball classifications.

PMR uses location (vector/slice), batted ball type, speed estimate, etc. to judge the difficulty of every batted ball.

PMR for pitchers isn’t necessarily any better for projecting future performances (although I’m sure you could properly adjust it to be so), but it would provide better results-based analysis.

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Nov 13, 2008 3:19 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't know if this makes me stupid or not, but I did it anyway.

I looked at Stat Corner’s pRAA, multiplied by 1.28 (which, if I’m not mistaken, is Tom Tango’s estimate for replacement level pitching), and looked at where those pitchers would rank. I didn’t bother witch pitching and gave ties to the pitchers because, well, I’m lazy.

Again, I may be totally off base, but this was easy and kept me busy.

45. Randy Johnson, P, ARI (40 Runs)
38. Javier Vazquez, P, CHW (42 Runs)
36. Derek Lowe, P, LAD (45 Runs)
32. Johan Santana, P, NYM (47 Runs)
26. Dan Haren, P, ARI (50 Runs)
18. Roy Hallady, P, TOR (56 Runs)
17. Brandon Webb, P, ARI (57 Runs)
13. Tim Lincecum, P, SF (61 Runs)
12. Cliff Lee, P, CLE (63 Runs)
9. C.C. Sabathia, P, MIL (67 Runs)

by philkid3 on Nov 12, 2008 4:13 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Excellent stuff

That’s as good a methodology as any, I think. Only thing I might think about is adjusting pRAA for league (DH vs. no DH). Or does pRAA do that already?

Pitchers are at a disadvantage if you do it this way, by the way. The hitters who rank high tend to have gotten “lucky”: balls falling for hits is the big one. But using tRA, that luck is removed for pitchers. To be on the same scale, we’d want to regress the position players a bit or use something like PrOPS.

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Nov 12, 2008 2:36 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think pRAA does it because "average" is league average

correct me if I’m wrong, of course

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by devil_fingers on Nov 12, 2008 2:45 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What are league average ERAs for the NL and AL, though?

Not very different. The DH makes a difference of about .40 runs per game, all else being equal. NL pitchers are worse than AL pitchers, so comparing them to themselves isn’t really fair to the AL pitchers.

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Nov 12, 2008 3:15 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Tango

Wasn’t one of the upshots of Tangos’ long post on calculating WAR that the distribution of talent in leagues was uneven pitching-wise, but even hitting wise, or something? he took that to mean that AL nonpitchers get the bonus, not pitchers themselves. Or something.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by devil_fingers on Nov 12, 2008 3:40 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Start posting on Beyond the Box Score »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Sleepy_jeff_small
WAR Lords of the Diamond (Pitchers)

Recent FanPosts

Small
SLG and Speed
Small
Interleague Attendance Nonsense
Limes_125_small
A Note About Becoming a BtB Author: Contributing to the Community Helps
Small
Is Adrian Beltre underrated...?
Limes_125_small
How Do You Like the New Daily Link Roundup Posts?
Stlouiscardinals_small
Depth Charts Help
Zorilla_small
How Do You Measure a Pitching Coach?
Limes_125_small
Looking For SQL & Tech Geek Help For Collaborative Projects
Small
When do MLBers get paid...?
Limes_125_small
Help Me Expand Who I Follow On Google Reader

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Fire Jim Leyland: Fu-Te Ni Follow Up; Concern Over Big Three?
Rany Gets Banned By the Royals
Contract Retrospective: Vernon Wells' 7-year, $126 Million Contract
The Rockets are innovative
Flip Flop Fly Ball
Yanks Considered Trading Rivera For Wells In '95: MLB Rumors - MLBTradeRumors.com
Bullpen Usuage Charts for Last 5 days
MiLB Game of the Week
Drive Mechanics Looks at Chris Perez's Mechanics and Pitch F/X numbers
WPA Inquirer

Post_icon New FanShot All FanShots Carrot-mini

Most Commented

Subscribe to BtB via Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

BtB Goes Social

BtB on Facebook

BtB_Sky on Twitter


Managers

Mos-def-the-ecstatic_small R.J. Anderson

Limes_125_small Sky Kalkman

Editors

Rawlings_baseball_bigger_small Dan Turkenkopf

Face_small Harry Pavlidis

770insig_small Jeff Zimmerman (TucsonRoyal)

Rickstache_small erik

Authors

Jinaz-reds-avatar_small JinAZ

Hms_surprise_small Graham

Wisc19cropped2_small jhmoore

Raysring1_small Tommy Rancel

E52205a2_small tbsmkdn

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports