Beyond the Box Score: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Transaction Roundup: Dodgers/D-Rays Swap

This trade is important to me personally, only because I joked on Prospectus Hit List twice that the Dodgers would acquire one more Tampa veteran at the deadline in exchange for a bigtime prospect, last time even citing Joel Guzman by name. Thanks for reading Mr. Colletti.

On a more serious note, this is a trade that helps the Dodgers a great deal right now, with Nomar Garciaparra and Jeff Kent both on the disabled list. Of course, there is a great deal of emphasis on the "right now" portion of that last statement; at the beginning of this year, Joel Guzman was one of the top, if not the top prospect in the Dodger system, and this year's setback at Las Vegas had the organization sour on him very quickly, first converting him to the outfield, and then flipping him to Tampa for a potential rent-a-player.

Star-divide

Let's take a look at Julio Lugo first. Starting with positionally-adjusted Net Runs Above Average:

Julio Lugo 2005-2006 w/2007 PECOTA
Year OUT EQA Games EQRAA ZRate pEQRAA pEqA pNRAA pNRAA/GP
2005 452 .277 158 13.36 1.79 16.33 .256 17.29 18.21
2006 207 .292 72 12.01 -1.00 13.70 .255 27.54 13.22
PECOTA 2007 401 .267 140 4.75 0.00 8.02 .255 8.59 8.02

Most of the rise in Lugo's EqA can be attributed to his sudden power surge; he's on pace for a career high in homeruns, hitting one every 24 at-bats. He's basically had a very uncharacteristic two-month span, where he has hit .333/.414/.566 in 189 at-bats (AB/HR of 17.2). Lugo is certainly a useful player, as evidenced by his 2005 campaign, as well as the PECOTA projection for 2007, but he is not a top-flight shortstop with power potential. If he maintains his production throughout the rest of 2006, the Dodgers can expect roughly 10.5 pNRAA in the remaining 57 games, which is a fantastic number. If he returns to his 2005 level of offense, the boys in blue will find themselves with roughly 3 pNRAA of production from Lugo.

He'll inject some much needed on-base percentage into the Dodgers lineup...until Jeff Kent and Nomar Garciaparra return from the disabled list. What do the Dodgers do then? If Kent comes back before Garciaparra, he can be pushed to first base until Nomar returns, but what then? It'll be interesting to see what the Dodgers do to justify the price they paid for this acquisition.

Speaking of the price, let's take a look at Sergio Pedroza and then Joel Guzman. After some fine hitting in the South Atlantic League, Pedroza was promoted to the Vero Beach Dodgers, and has struggled so far, although the sample is very small. Pedroza has an outside shot at being a major leaguer one day from everything I've read about him, but with the Rays attempting to reinject (or inject for the first time I guess) depth into their farm system, he's worth taking a chance on.

Joel Guzman on the other hand, was rated an A- by John Sickels in his prospect book, and was the #3 prospect in the stacked Dodger system (behind Chad Billingsley and Andy LaRoche) in this year's Baseball America Prospect Handbook. He hit .290/.346/.443 through July 28, which is no great shakes, but the league average was .269/.340/.410. He hit well in every month except May, where a .255/.342/.304 showing in 102 at-bats helped to drag his season line down somewhat. Take a look at some of his splits so far this year, as well as his batted-ball data from Las Vegas:

Joel Guzman 2006 Splits & Batted-Ball Data
AB BA OBP SLG BABIP GB% LD% FB% IF/F HR/F
Overall 314 .290 .346 .443 .349 48.8% 15.9% 30.1% 14.9% 13.5%
vs LHP 89 .315 .347 .461 .356 50.0% 15.8% 31.6% 7.7% 8.3%
vs RHP 225 .280 .345 .436 .346 48.2% 15.9% 29.4% 18.0% 16.0%
Home 178 .303 .345 .427 .365 49.3% 16.0% 29.9% 14.0% 9.3%
Road 136 .272 .346 .463 .326 48.0% 15.7% 30.4% 16.2% 19.4%

His Batting Averages on Balls in Play are all running a little higher than they should, based off his Line Drive percentages, but otherwise, everything looks spiffy. Guzman's walk rate could use a boost, but his power (outside of that awful May) is closer to .500 slugging wise than his overall line suggests. One final note on his production: his park-adjusted minor league line is .280/.336/.443; yes, park-adjusted minor league line. Bless the Minor League Splits Database

Supposedly Guzman has makeup issues, which means he'll fit right in with the rest of the D-Rays top prospects. All kidding aside, this is some of the tastiest icing on the cake that Rays fans could've hoped for in Andrew Friedman's quest to slowly take over the Dodger organization. Maybe the next deal will be for Director of Amateur Scouting Logan White; after all, he knows the D-Rays farm system as well as his own. Ok, that was the last one, I promise.

The D-Rays are banking on Guzman's talent overcoming any attitude or effort issues he may have, which makes total sense. Rather than sit on Lugo again and collect draft picks, the Rays were able to reel in a somewhat established player with a great deal of potential who can help them relatively soon. Andrew Friedman is proving himself a worthy executive, which is great news for Rays fans who remain (rightfully) bitter at the last front office in charge.

I'm not making excuses for Guzman's setback; he certainly looks like his productions come down a notch, but he's 21-years old in Triple-A, you sort of have to expect that. He's younger than the guy he was traded along with who just got himself out of A-ball if you want some real perspective, and Pedroza's no slug with the bat either; his improvement from last year (.207/.294/.480) is significant, regardless of age, and the fact that the Dodgers gave up on a top prospect and a sleeper type in exchange for an infielder on the wrong side of 30 in the midst of a career half-season with the bat is just plain stupid, especially considering the leaps and bounds they are going to have to make to really get back into this race.

If this were one prospect, it'd be a different story, but each one of Colletti's trades is following this theme (excepting his absolute steal of Wilson Betemit earlier in the week). Edwin Jackson, Chuck Tiffany, Dioner Navarro, Joel Guzman. All to Tampa. And for what? A nominal closer, a washed up starter who can't consistently keep the Dodgers in a game, and a middle infielder who might not even have a starting spot on the roster in a few weeks. If Lugo ends up replacing Wilson Betemit at third base when Kent and Nomar return, then Dodgers fans should probably just riot and get it over with. I'm not sure what happened to Colletti's stance on not trading away the future to improve on their longshot for the playoffs now, but the words seem pretty hollow to me now. I don't mean to throw this all on Colletti's shoulders; after all, he has scouting people and assistants who look after and analyze these players just as much as he does. The decision to package off as much as they can in the predicament the team finds themselves in is just perplexing; the time to do this was a few weeks back, when the Dodgers still looked to be within easy striking distance of the division. Now they are five games under .500 with three teams to leapfrog, one of them in Arizona returning to the dominant form they displayed early in the season. Timing is everything, and this timing sucks.

0 recs  |  Comment 5 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

So, i'm not sure I understand.
you...don't like the deal?
Daily Brewers Blog: BrewCrewBall.com

by jeffbcb on Jul 31, 2006 11:52 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Re:
That was a little more negative than I usually get, eh?
"I don't set the rosters, I just make fun of the guy who does" - Rob Neyer

by Marc Normandin on Aug 1, 2006 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Negative
I'd like to take a bit of credit for the negative slant on this... I've been relentlessly bashing this deal all afternoon...

by Dan Scotto on Aug 1, 2006 12:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Feast or Famine on Flyballs
I haven't looked at too many batters' balls-in-play data, so this may be just me, but does Guzman's IF/F and HR/F rates look really funny?

22% IF/F is comparable with Jose Lopez and Yuniesky Betancourt among MLB qualifiers, and would be 2nd in the league to Eric Byrnes.

16% HR/F is comparable with David Wright and Matt Holliday and is above-average.

*For the record, the HR/F data is from Hardball Times, where they track HR per outfield flies, not total flyballs, as per their stats glossary.

Not sure about your batted ball data.

Either way, it just strikes me as odd that someone who hits lots of pop-ups can also hit lots of homeruns.

Thoughts?

by Trev on Aug 1, 2006 3:11 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

re:
I can't make a general blanket statement in regards to pop-ups and homeruns, so I'm not sure. I don't see any reason why a guy can't get jammed and pop-up often and at the same time make solid contact on other pitches. But in this case, yes, I did make a mistake on my spreadsheet, and it caused some problems with the data. I reloaded the table with the correct IF/F figures. It was a simple mistake in the spreadsheet, I hadn't used it yet, so I didn't catch it until just now. I forgot to add the pop-ups into the total flyballs in the raw data, so it took a percentage of a lower number than it should have. It's all set now though.

One thing to remember with the numbers you pulled from above: those are just the splits, so they are skewed more than an overall line would be. When you look at his overall numbers, they're much more streamlined looking due to his splits against left-handed pitching.

Thanks for picking that mistake out for me, I appreciate it.

"I don't set the rosters, I just make fun of the guy who does" - Rob Neyer

by Marc Normandin on Aug 1, 2006 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?
Start posting on Beyond the Box Score »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
PZR-based Win Values 2001-2006

Recent FanPosts

Small
The "30 parks on a budget" challenge
Sunflower_small
World Series Simulation, Game #6
Small
JT20 Dynasty League
E52205a2_small
New Look
Sth70021_small
Exploring Hit f/x, Albeit Badly
Redcap_small
Ricky Nolasco: 4 WAR or 1 WAR?
Redcap_small
Apparently I can't do park adjustments
Small
Which tells us more: The last 7 at bats or 7 at bats against this pitcher?
Sleepy_jeff_small
How Efficient and Effective Were the Rockies in 2009?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

The Mistake Lottery
On the Field, the Yankees Are The Team of the Decade. Off It? The Red Sox.
Tigers' all-time WAR leaders
Primer on Runs Created
How to improve basketball
LB Keith Bulluck uses a sabermetric analogy to explain the Titans' quarterback situation.
Alcides Escobar "abandoned his daughter before she was born"
UZR, Scouting, and the Fans
Not-So-Lousy Lineup Optimizer, Playoff Edition: New York Yankees

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

BtB on Twitter

Main Feed: @BtBScore

Tommy B: @tommy_bennett
Sky: @BtB_Sky
Dan: @dturkenk
Harry: @harrypav
Jinaz: @jinazreds
Jack: @jh_moore
Erik: @Erik_Manning
Tommy R: @trancel
Justin: @justinbopp

Subscribe to BtB via Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Most Commented

BtB Goes Social


Managers

Nando_small R.J. Anderson

Limes_125_small Sky Kalkman

E52205a2_small Tommy Bennett

Editors

Face_small Harry Pavlidis

Rawlings_baseball_bigger_small Dan Turkenkopf

770insig_small Jeff Zimmerman (TucsonRoyal)

Aviles_small Justin Bopp

Authors

Banny_small erik

Raysring1_small Tommy Rancel

Jinaz-reds-avatar_small JinAZ

Jmlogo_small Jack Moore

1753738656_110919ebe9_o_small vivaelpujols

1_small Graham

Baseball_small Mike Rogers

Redcap_small SFiercex4

Small Patrick Clark

Walter_album_small Walter Fulbright