Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Roundtable: Which Draft Pick Is Most Likely To Bust?

Crosby to the DL...Again

Bobby Crosby, resident lineup savior of the Oakland Athletics earlier this year, is on the disabled list again with a broken ankle. Their trainer Larry Davis seems to feel like Crosby will be up and active in a few weeks. Will Carroll will surely have more on this tomorrow, so make sure to check out his Under the Knife column at Baseball Prospectus tomorrow afternoon.

"He will be back. I would like to see him back out there in under three weeks," Davis said. "We'll try to figure out everything we can do to speed this up. Fortunately, it's a non-displaced fracture and it's fairly stable right now, so he'll be able to take some light batting practice, doing his throwing, some aerobic stuff on a bike and possible work out in a swimming pool. So when he's pain-free and the doctors clear him, he should be ready to play."

How should this affect the team itself? Let's take a look at Crosby's production level according to Net Runs Above Average versus that of his replacements. Keith Ginter was called up from Triple-A to take over Crosby's roster spot, but that does not necessarily mean he will be starting.

Crosby is the top performer on this team according to NRAA, so his presence will be sorely missed. The only thing that even resembles help as a replacement for Crosby over the next few crucial September weeks is the PECOTA/Marc Normandin tweaked version of Keith Ginter. I tweaked it, because I had to assume a games played total and figure outs myself for Ginter's NRAA projection to work. If he can hit like he did last season in Milwaukee (.262/.333/.479 with a .275 EqA in 2004) or like he has shown during his time with the Triple-A Sacramento River Cats (.333/.387/.632 makes me feel like he can replicate last year in Milwaukee or better) while playing adequate defense, the A's can deal without Crosby over the course of 3 weeks. Crosby is worth 6.45 NRAA over a 30 game span; PECOTA Ginter is worth -.120 over the same span; not impressive, but just a tad below average, which is better than what Scutaro is providing (-.333 over a 30 game span.) Granted, 6.45 runs above average is more than 6 runs, but average players have their place, and you could do worse as a replacement. You could be playing Cristian Guzman (.194/.236/.273; -32.39 NRAA) and replacing him with Deivi Cruz (.268/.301/.397; -7.04 NRAA). I'll take 2004 Keith Ginter, thank you very much. This should not worry A's fans too much if Nick Swisher and Dan Johnson can keep up their youthful excellence over the duration of Crosby's absence. If not, the sound they will hear is the Angels breathing down their necks in the divisional race even more than they already are.

If you would like to make a donation or help the Red Cross in their efforts to fix the damage caused by Katrina, check out the blogad on the left of this weblog. Say a prayer for those who were hit hard by the hurricane; I have a buddy down there in his first year at college. Nice start huh?

Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Crosby Questions
in today's BP Notes:
"Actually, the one-month downgrade at shortstop might not be that crushing. Scutaro's fielding, achieved mostly during Crosby's first leave of absence, was tremendous according to FRAR (+28) and FRAA (+8). In similar amounts of playing time, Crosby's WARP (4.8) isn't so far from Scutaro's (3.3) that anyone should expect much more than a half-win difference over the season's final month."

I mean, I beg to differ. I'm glad NRAA shows a big improvement from Scuto to Crosby. Especially since the A's suddenly sparked to life when Crosby showed up. So can we in any way use NRAA to translate to Wins? Is there a flaw in WARP here? Or am I simply overreacting to the BP comments because I'm a Crosby Fan? 8)

by cephyn on Sep 1, 2005 4:48 PM EDT reply actions  

The thing is
That the difference between Scutaro and Crosby over a span of 30 games is not that large. Crosby is definitely the better player, and I expect more out of him offensively and defensively, but over such a small span of time it should not hurt them too bad. Think of how the Red Sox were still able to win without Nomar in the lineup sometimes, using players like Manny Alexander and Rey Sanchez in his stead. Scutaro is better than those two.
"I don't set the rosters, I just make fun of the guy who does" - Rob Neyer

by Marc Normandin on Sep 1, 2005 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

thing is
i hate the "not enough games" to make a difference argument. hate it hate it hate it. when DOES it make a difference then? 40? 80? 81? 79? Especially when the AL West could come down to 1 game. It's pretty tight. I think it absolutely might make a difference over 30 games. maybe over 5 games. and since i hate putting a number on it...yes, one game.

IMO. 8/

by cephyn on Sep 1, 2005 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!

SaberGraphics

Yahoo_full_count

MLB Daily Dish

Get the latest MLB Trade Rumors, Transactions, and News at MLB Daily Dish!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Columnists:

Adam_small adarowski

Dme_small Satchel Price

Closeup4_small J-Doug

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

Featuring:

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Recent_pic_pg_small Patrick Gordon

Btbpro_small Dave Gershman

Me_small Bryan Grosnick

229331_10150183361996591_674441590_6760167_6637860_n3_small Lewie Pollis

Img_3830_small David Fung

30472_1481067225243_1190689185_1381415_997334_n_small Glenn DuPaul

1mnvxku7_small joshuaworn

Set_small MattFilippi18

Photo0011_small Nathaniel Stoltz