Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Nevin Shapiro Vows To Bring Down Miami

Royals Sign Mays, Sanders

Reggie Sanders signed a two-year deal for $10 million with the Kansas City Royals. Not a bad move, but it is hardly going to make them contenders. Last year had 11 Win Shares (WS) in 93 games. For 162 games, it would be about 19, just below the all-star level of 20. But he is 38 and also only played 130 and 135 games in the previous two seasons. His WS totals for the last 3 years are 18-14-11.

The Cubs signed Jacque Jones, also an outfielder, to a 3-year deal for about $16 million. His WS totals the last 3 years were 14-13-13. He will only be 31 when the season starts. Maybe veteran, average to slightly better than aveage outfielders are going for about $5 million a year.

Bill James projects Sanders to play in 109 games in 2006 with a .324 OBP and a .479 SLG. I assumne that was based on playing in St. Louis, perhahps in the now flattened Busch Stadium. Kaufmann stadium in KC is probably a worse hitting park, so Sanders might do even worse than that.

Joe Mays is 30 and is mainly used as a starter. But he has only made 17, 21 and 26 starts the last three seasons averaging just about 6 innings per start (that goes back to 2002-he did not pitch at all in 2004). His ERAs were 5.38, 6.30, and 5.65. James projected him to pitch 140 innings with a 4.86 ERA. His numbers might improve since, as mentioned above, he will be in a poor hitter's park. But he does not pitch well on the road. His last 3 full season road ERAs have been 6.75, 5.45, and 7.46. That may be a good indicator of his true quality. He gave up 33 HRs in 173 IP on the road the last 3 seasons. His career strikeout to walk ratio is 1.61 while the league average is 1.89.

The Royals signed him to a 1 year deal for $1 million. He can get a bonus if he makes enough starts. According to the Yahoo report, the Royals think he will pitch well since this will be his second year after Tommy John surgery because pitchers finally bounce back in that second year. They say he is a sinker ball pitcher and will do well with the Royals improved infield defense. I never heard of that before about the Tommy John surgery. But it seems like wishful thinking since Mays has had only one good season in his career.

Overall, it is hard to see what the Royals are trying to accomplish. They won only 56 games last year and these moves are not likely to add many wins. Even if they added 10 wins, they only go up to 66, a total that will not generate much excitement among the fans. They signed two veterans, so they are not building for the future.

Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The only thing I can guess
that the Royals are trying to accomplish is a bit of good PR, as in "hey, we went out and signed some proven veterans like Reggie Sanders and Mark Grudzielanek."  (Maybe all the Cardinal fans in MO will go to KC more often and watch the ex-Cards play?)

So yeah, this certainly wasn't the best use of funds on the part of the Royals.  But what CAN this team do to improve?  They've been in "rebuilding mode" since the early 90's!  Any suggestions out there?  

matty fred is a web log.

by matty fred @ Beyond the Box Score on Dec 26, 2005 3:54 PM EST reply actions  

Royals
1.Define priorities
2.Do not trade any ballplayer at bench level or who you project to be at replacement level...anybody else is up for grabs at all times
3.Double scouting budget...cut budget from other departments knowing that the team on the field ultimately supports all budgets....
4.Having deployed resources to scouting create the orgazational reality that finding quality young baseball players of character is the mission of the franchise
5.Utilize free agency to create bench or rp level pitching staff
6.The Royals can contact me on #s 7 thru 25

by Buzzards Bay on Dec 26, 2005 11:54 PM EST reply actions  

Sounds like a plan.
Unfortunately, the Royals have lost most of the confidence and goodwill among their remaining fans by constantly promising that they had a "plan" to make the team better and it never really happening.  Even if the KC front office instituted the kind of plan you suggest, would they nevertheless be stricken with a sort of "reverse-crying-wolf" syndrome?  One thing that I think would really help the Royals' future prospects in terms of fan confidence would be new ownership, as it would signal to the fans much more effectively than a new revolving-door GM that this time, the "plan" is for real.  I don't think that new ownership is very likely, however, especially new ownership that would keep the team in KC.
matty fred is a web log.

by matty fred @ Beyond the Box Score on Dec 27, 2005 6:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Royals
My view of this ballclub is that you need to get to 82 wins before anything in the affirmative can happen...I don't understand "reverse wolf" because this mission needs to be honest  ...there are no shadows and no mirrors...there is only a misery index.....and the challenge is daunting.....when the caller id says KC Royals in 24 months you want the other MLB clubs to wonder what you have to say.....every team in the National League is engaged with their own specific rubiks cube... they are your first .......I went right to # 17

by Buzzards Bay on Dec 28, 2005 12:16 AM EST reply actions  

I was trying
to be clever and failed miserably (definitely not the first time!).  What I mean to say is that even if KC attempts to take sound, affirmative steps, the years and years of organizational stasis that has preceded them coupled with years and years of promises "to do better" gives them very low credibility with the (potential, already lost, still hanging on) KC fans.  I just wonder if they've dug themselves in too deep of a hole to ever be able to get out of.  
matty fred is a web log.

by matty fred @ Beyond the Box Score on Dec 28, 2005 12:26 PM EST up reply actions  

coincidentally ...
... here is BP's take.  This was interesting:
That's the big theme of these acquisitions, one that reportedly will continue with the signing of outfielder Reggie Sanders. The Royals are on a two-year plan, matching the time remaining on Mike Sweeney's contract, in which they intend to use veteran placeholders to support their youngsters. Like cedar chips in a closet, having a bunch of mildly above-average thirtysomethings around the clubhouse could keep the club from stinking while the Royals await the arrival of prospects like Billy Butler, Alex Gordon, Justin Huber, and Chris Lubanski. In 2008, all those players could be in the show, along with $15 million which will come off the payroll in veteran players.
matty fred is a web log.

by matty fred @ Beyond the Box Score on Dec 28, 2005 12:48 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Prince Fielder in Comerica Park
Crystal_ball_small
Sparky vs Buck
Img_3830_small
BtBS Fantasy League
Small
Context Neutral Run and RBI projections
Small
Free Agent Compensation
Img_0001_small
Value of Various Plate Approaches
Strike_three2_small
Effect of Foul Area on Strikeouts: AL 1954-68: Erratum
Small
Baseball on a stick
Small
Player Evaluating Statistic
Baseball_small
Rays Outfield: Cheap but Extremely Productive

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!

SaberGraphics

MLB Daily Dish

Get the latest MLB Trade Rumors, Transactions, and News at MLB Daily Dish!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Columnists:

Adam_small adarowski

Dme_small Satchel Price

Closeup4_small J-Doug

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

Featuring:

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Picture-6_small Chris St. John

Btbpro_small Dave Gershman

229331_10150183361996591_674441590_6760167_6637860_n3_small Lewie Pollis

Img_3830_small David Fung